Suggested Answers to the Second Short Quiz

.
Click here for, inter alia --

The First Short Quiz entitled "The 1992 Acquisition of the Democratic Party as a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of The Establishment" and

The Second Short Quiz entitled “Identity Politics: A ‘Token’ Black President Who ‘Knew His Place’ on the Establishment’s ‘Plantation.’”

[NB: We have always defined “The Establishment” as the billionaires who, since 1992, have “owned” virtually all the pols of both political parties as a result of campaign contributions, who “own” many (if not most) of the members of The Mainstream Media, and who “own” many members of academia.]
Post Reply
johnkarls
Posts: 2033
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:43 pm

Suggested Answers to the Second Short Quiz

Post by johnkarls »

.
Suggested Answer to the Second Short Quiz
Identity Politics: A “Token” Black President Who “Knew His Place”


Please re-read the Suggested Answers to the First Short Quiz before continuing -- so that this quiz does not have to become hopelessly cluttered with redundant material.


Question 1

For our Wed 1/17/2007 meeting 10.5 years ago, had our group selected Yours Truly’s proposal as the focus books: (A) Sen. Barack Obama’s “The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream” (Crown Publishing - 2006) and (B) Sen. Obama’s “Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance” (Times Books - 1995)?

Answer 1

Yes.

Question 2

On 1/17/2007, had Sen. Obama been in the U.S. Senate for only 2 years? BTW, was 1/17/2007 eight months BEFORE the inauguration of our bulletin board http://www.ReadingLiberally-SaltLake.org?

Answer 2

Yes. Yes.

Question 3

But most importantly, had Yours Truly proposed Sen. Obama’s two biographies on 10/19/2006, the day that Oprah Winfrey featured “The Audacity of Hope” in the wildly-popular and highly-influential “book review” portion of The Oprah Winfrey Show DURING WHICH SHE “NOMINATED” SEN. OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT!!!???

Answer 3

Yes.

Question 4

Following our 1/17/2007 meeting (though obviously NOT causally related), did Sen. Obama officially announce his candidacy for President on 2/10/2007?

Answer 4

Yes.

Question 5

At our 1/17/2007 meeting, did Yours Truly rhapsodize about Sen. Obama on the bases, inter alia, of (A) how he had shunned a lucrative law career after heading the prestigious Harvard Law Review in order to provide legal representation to community groups/causes in one of the nation’s most notorious inner-city areas (Chicago’s “South Side”), and (B) how from his years of serving Chicago’s South Side where The “I Have A Dream”® Foundation had more than half-a-dozen projects, Sen. Obama would know what it takes to mainstream America’s 30% Permanent Under-Caste and would presumably proceed to engage in the “heavy lifting” of doing so?

Answer 5

(A) Yes. (B) Yes.

Question 6

However, upon assuming the Office of President, did President Obama continue The Establishment’s “War on American Workers” begun by Bill Clinton (as discussed in the Suggested Answers to the First Short Quiz)?

Answer 6

Yes.

Question 7

For example, did President Obama negotiate and, on 2/4/2016, sign the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (aka TPP) which was a free-trade agreement among 12 Pacific nations and which was described as “the largest trade agreement in history”?

Answer 7

Yes.

Question 8

Did President Obama even intervene in Britain’s “Brexit” Referendum about whether Britain would leave the European Union -- personally campaigning energetically in Britain with the message that if Britain left the European Union, then Britain would have to go “to the end of the line” in negotiating free-trade agreements with the U.S.? In other words, that President Obama would punish Britain by refusing to negotiate the additional Exportation of American Jobs to Britain?

Answer 8

Yes. Yes.

Question 9

Is the sad history of American free-trade agreements that nobody represents the American worker??? In other words, the foreign countries negotiate for the Importation of American Jobs and the U.S. Government negotiates SOLELY TO PROTECT THE AMERICAN COMPANIES THAT EXPORT AMERICAN JOBS??? That when the American Companies contract with (and typically set up and finance) independently-owned manufacturing companies in foreign countries such as China, TO MANUFACTURE THE U.S. COMPANY’S PRODUCTS UNDER THE U.S COMPANY’S SUPERVISION TO THE U.S. COMPANY’S SPECIFICATIONS USING THE U.S. COMPANY’S PATENTS AND KNOW-HOW, the U.S. Government has protected them in the free-trade agreement against the foreign government doing such things as stealing the U.S. Company’s patents and know-how, and against the foreign government failing to enforce the contract between the U.S. company and the independently-owned foreign manufacturing company that U.S. company has set up???

Answer 9

Yes, the sad history of American free-trade agreements is that the foreign countries negotiate for American jobs while the U.S. Government negotiates SOLELY for protection of the American Companies that are exporting the American jobs -- AND NOBODY NEGOTIATES ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN WORKERS WHOSE JOBS ARE BEING EXPORTED!!!

Question 10

Did President Obama continue Bill Clinton’s policy of REFUSING TO ENFORCE the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 so that the country would be flooded with de facto “slave labor” that could not complain about any treatment meted out to them for fear of being deported?

Answer 10

Yes.

Question 11

Why would America’s first Black President continue what had been Bill Clinton’s policy of SINGLE-HANDEDLY REVERSING THE OUTCOME OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR???

Answer 11

God only knows!!!


******************************************************************************
PRESIDENT OBAMA’S REFUSAL TO PERMIT THE MAINSTREAMING OF AMERICA’S 30% PERMANENT UNDER-CASTE

Question 12

Why did President Obama immediately concentrate all his energies as President on enacting Obamacare, rather than doing anything to mainstream America’s 30% Permanent Under-Caste such as promoting IHAD- and/or IHAD-style programs???

NB: As noted in Q&A-18 of the First Short Quiz, Obamacare had NOTHING to do with the poor who had been covered by Medicaid since 1965 pursuant to President Lyndon Johnson’s “Great Society Program” -- Obamacare merely expanded Medicaid to cover the Lower Middle Class.

Answer 12

God only knows!!!

Question 13

Indeed, why did President Obama and 20 other prominent members of his administration and prominent Democratic office holders in California REFUSE TO PERMIT $84 BILLION of private funds to provide IHAD- and/or IHAD-style programs to enable 10 MILLION inner-city children to “escape a fate worse than death”???

NB: Hundreds of court documents and other materials documenting this refusal are contained in http://www.ReadingLiberally-SaltLake.org’s third and fourth sections which are entitled “Inner-City Holocaust and America’s Apartheid ‘Justice’ System (In Honor of Jonathan Kozol and In Memory of John Howard Griffin).

Answer 13

Why indeed!!!

Question 14

BTW did “The Deep State” protest President Obama’s refusal to permit the $84 BILLION of private funds to benefit the 10 MILLION inner-city children in the form of an obviously-unauthorized response to the letters to President Obama by a top-level career official who waxed eloquently in praise of IHAD programs!!!???

Answer 14

Yes. Though the top-level career official signed the letter with his name and position disclosed.

Question 15

Indeed, why did President Obama, after wasting nearly his entire 8 years as President by focusing on Obamacare, finally focus on the poor by launching his “War on Cops”?

Answer 15

God only knows!!!

Question 16

Was President Obama’s “War on Cops” simply an Establishment-approved cost-effective way of avoiding the “heavy lifting” that would be required to mainstream America’s 30% Permanent Under-Caste?

Answer 16

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 17

Did President Obama effectively conjure into existence the “Black Lives Matter” movement following the killing of Trayvon Martin in Sanford FL by George Zimmerman, a Hispanic neighborhood-watch volunteer?

Answer 17

Yes.

Question 18

Was the 7/13/2013 formation of “Black Lives Matter” just in time for it to organize sufficiently to impose itself on the national scene for the first time in the 8/9/2014 killing in Ferguson MO of Michael Brown by Police Officer Darren Wilson?

Answer 18

Yes.

Question 19

Did the Mainstream Media, aided and abetted by President Obama and Black Lives Matter, perpetrate the “Hands Up - Don’t Shoot” BIG LIE???

NB: There is posted in the “Reference Materials” section of http://www.ReadingLiberally-SaltLake.org for our 9/6/2017 meeting the 86-page 3/4/2015 Report of President Obama’s own Eric Holder Justice Department on the shooting. The report details (pp. 16-26) the physical and forensic evidence, including autopsies, DNA analysis, dispatch recordings, ballistics, fingerprints, audio recordings of the shots being fired, etc., etc. It also describes in detail (pp. 26-78) all of the witness statements -- ONLY 8 OF WHICH WERE CONSISTENT WITH THE PHYSICAL AND FORENSIC EVIDENCE. Of the eight witnesses DOJ considered credible, 4 were Black and 2 were Bi-Racial. The DOJ Report also records the EXTREME INTIMIDATION of witnesses by the local community, including MANY who refused to testify, even after being subpoenaed.

Answer 19

Yes, the Mainstream Media, aided and abetted by President Obama and Black Lives Matter, perpetrated the “Hands Up - Don’t Shoot” BIG LIE!!!

Question 20

In all fairness to President Obama and Black Lives Matter, wasn’t the “Hands Up - Don’t Shoot” BIG LIE simply a matter of bad luck since, after all, there have been quite a few documented incidents of unlawful killings of unarmed Blacks by police officers???

Answer 20

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 21

Nevertheless, did hundreds of Black Lives Matter protestors march behind their “Black Lives Matter” banner on 8/29/2015 at the Minnesota State Fair just hours after a Harris County TX sheriff’s deputy was ambushed and executed at a Houston-area gas station with the chant: “Pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon; pigs in a blanket, fry ‘em like bacon (ad nauseam)”?

Answer 21

Yes.

Question 22

And did thousands of Black Lives Matter protestors march around Manhattan for several days during December 2014 (while Yours Truly BTW was in town) chanting: “What do we want? Dead cops!!! When do we want them? Now!!! What do we want? Dead cops!!! When do we want them? Now!!! (ad nauseam)???

Answer 22

Yes.

Question 23

Did Black Lives Matter get its wish for assassinations of police officers in, for example, NYC (a double assassination in Brooklyn followed by a single assassination in the Bronx) and Dallas (5 assassinations in one incident)???

Answer 23

Yes.

Question 24

Did President Obama honor the efforts of Black Lives Matter by inviting their leaders to the White House on 7/14/2016???

Answer 24

Yes.

Question 25

Haven’t the most effective policies for combatting racial division been the efforts of the entertainment industry over the last 50 years to portray Blacks as intelligent and wonderful human beings? And all of the efforts of the sports-broadcast industry to have Black commentators who are intelligent and wonderful human beings?

Answer 25

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 26

So how many decades do you think President Obama HAS SET BACK these efforts with his divisive and hate-filled rhetoric??? Or don’t you think his rhetoric about the police has been hate-filled???

Answer 26

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

After all, President Obama made the conscious decision over many months to portray America’s inner-city Blacks as ANGRY RIOTERS WHO WANT TO ASSASSINATE POLICE OFFICERS!!!

Which is bound to undo 50 years of effort by the entertainment industry and the sports-broadcast industry to carefully craft an image of Blacks as intelligent and wonderful human beings!!!

Question 27

Since President Obama was so adamantly opposed to mainstreaming America’s 30% Permanent Under-Caste, wouldn’t a more-constructive approach than his “War on Cops” have been modelled after the National Labor Relations Act???

Answer 27

Please see Q&A-28 throgh Q&A-30.

Question 28

After all, how many of us remember vividly how America’s Black comedians reacted to the riots around America following the 1968 assassinations of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy – (paraphrasing) “It makes no sense to riot in our own neighborhoods and destroy our own businesses which will be very costly to replace (if that is even possible) -- NEXT TIME WE’LL GO TO THE SUBURBS TO RIOT!!!”???

Answer 28

So how many of us are old enough to recall these jokes vividly???

Question 29

So wouldn’t it make more sense to employ the National Labor Relations Act model of identifying the REAL STAKEHOLDERS (the employees in the case of the NLRA -- or the residents of the community in which the police killing occurred BUT EXCLUDING OUTSIDERS), and then to conduct a referendum on what/who the community wants???

Answer 29

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 30

Wouldn’t it have been interesting to have seen Black Lives Matter campaign in Ferguson MO for voter approval by Ferguson RESIDENTS to be policed by a new police force that Black Lives Matter would assemble and train???

Answer 30

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 31

Do you think that The Establishment “is laughing all the way to the bank” over President Obama’s decision to waste his time on Obamacare which involves minimal cost to The Establishment when compared to the “heavy lifting” that would be required to mainstream America’s 30% Permanent Under-Caste?

Answer 31

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 32

Do you think that The Establishment “laughed all the way to the bank” over President Obama’s opposition to permitting $84 BILLION of private funds to be used to provide IHAD- or IHAD-style programs that would have enabled 10 MILLION inner-city children to escape “a fate worse than death”???

Answer 32

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 33

After all, weren’t the $84 BILLION of private funds the amount that 15 of the world’s largest financial institutions owed Yours Truly and that had long-since been pledged in legally-binding fashion to provide IHAD- or IHAD-style programs for the 10 MILLION inner-city children???

Answer 33

The “Question Presented For Review” in our petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to accept our appeal said it all --

“Can state court judges order their decisions which they know are diametrically-opposed to well-settled law, not to be published or cited (a strategy labeled ‘the segregated toilet’ in correspondence with 51 inner-city clergy who represent the 10 million inner-city children who have been disclosed from the outset as the ‘real parties at interest’ in this law suit) in order to flush away the rights of the 10 million inner-city children without disturbing the rights of first-class American citizens -- without violating the ‘Equal Protection of the Law’ requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?”

If President Obama had “lifted a finger” to save the 10 MILLION inner-city children from “a fate worse than death” (by authorizing the U.S. Department of Justice to file an Amicus Curiae brief supporting our petition), The Establishment would have had to pay the $84 BILLION that they owed!!!

[NB: The 51 inner-city clergy referenced in the Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court were NEVER asked for any financial support and indeed, none of them ever offered any. Instead, they and their congregants were asked for their prayers and non-financial support. And to stand ready to become volunteer tutors/mentors so that IHAD- or IHAD-style programs could be formed immediately if any funds had become available (my own IHAD-Stamford CT program in the 1990’s serving 200 “Dreamers” in 3 different housing projects featured tutors/mentors obtained by appeals to local churches/synagogues whose clergy served on our Advisory Board). The fourth section of http://www.ReadingLiberally-SaltLake.org contains, inter alia, the final report to each of the 51 inner-city clergy from San Francisco, Los Angeles and Oakland who had been supporting the cause to (A) inform them that the US Supreme Court on 10/4/2011 refused to hear our appeal, (B) thank them for their efforts with the solace that each of us would be able to say at The Pearly Gates with St. Paul (II Timothy 4:7): “I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith” and (C) request them and their congregants to pray for the souls of the 43 news-media superstars, the 21 governmental officials, the California judges and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices.]

Question 34

Do you think The Establishment is “laughing all the way to the bank” over the cost effectiveness of President Obama’s “War on Cops” when compared to the “heavy lifting” that would be required to mainstream America’s 30% Permanent Under-Caste???

Answer 34

What do you think??? Let’s discuss!!!

Question 35

Do you think the following would be an appropriate epitaph for President Obama --

America’s First “Token” Black President
He “Knew His Place” on The Establishment’s “Plantation”
He Condemned 10 MILLION Inner-City Children to “A Fate Worse Than Death”

Answer 35

It is respectfully suggested that this would be the MOST APPROPRIATE epitaph for President Obama!!!

Post Reply

Return to “Participant Comments - The War On Cops: How the New Attack on Law & Order Makes Everyone Less Safe by Heather MacDonald - Sep 6”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests